9/11 Revisited


Believe or not to believe. That is the bloody question! One hears so much lies and BS on the media that we get difficulties recognizing the truth even if right there in front of us. Politicizing the understanding of a. truth seems to have become the predisposition of neo-fascism in certain political and media spheres of the USA .When left-wing commentators denounce 9/11 truth activists, the activist/s are derided as right-wing conspiracy freaks -- lumped in with the Tea Party and various hate groups. When it is the Right's turn to attack, those seeking answers about 9/11 are uniformly painted as Bush-burnt America haters, the very worst of the left-wing losers.

Today we wake up to a new media frenzy over Iranian President Ahmadinejad, apparently being now a 9/11 denier. By reading his actual and unedited speech, one realizes Ahmadinejad to have simply echoed what has been rumoured by everyone, everywhere. It could however be a wanton attempt by established news outlets in pretending concernment, but in reality thinking “well said” and hoping to cause the necessary fuss and generate the required publicity for future headlines and may be research permissions on the issue, certainly only to refute Ahmadinejad for their respective editorials ;). Whatever the case, Iran’s Ahmadinejad seems the man of the hour, yet again by going on record in the United Nations and officially claiming doubts over the 9/11 events the USA emphasizes so much upon…. After all two wars have started based on that event, many restrictions and control mechanisms were placed on the American society ever since, not least almost all Western democracies have coordinated their intelligence sharing apparatus like flight information and Bank transactions with each other and the US intelligence, all because of the black & white version of the 9/11 events.

Ahmadinejad's unedited speech


Predicting the immediate future is easy; the establishment (anti-conspiracy) will attack Ahmadinejad and relate the Holocaust denial with 9/11, and rest its case. The anti establishment (left wing pro-conspiracy) people will let the dust to settle and build on the new arisen interest with new reports and assessments….Until the glorious day where an insider appears and confesses to have been the man or woman to plant the explosives in the building prior to 9/11. What all this media mayhem would mean to the Iran-USA relations, remains to be seen but by the looks of it Iran seems to be indicating a dual alley of dialogue and hostility. USA would serve its interests and that of Iran’s well if it could finally resist the AIPAC lobby and start dealing directly with Iran.

Here a little underpinning



Comments

Anonymous said…
You Iranians are awkward people, best of friends or worst of enemies.
Mon Oct 04, 10:33:00 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Sanctions

Image
Mr. M. Sahimi wrote "When she was running for president in 2008, Hillary Rodham Clinton threatened to obliterate Iran if it attacked Israel. Her opponent, Barack Obama, responded that Clinton’s threat was "too much like Bush" Four years later Iran has not attacked Israel (and will not do so, unless attacked by Israel first), but President Obama is actually carrying out the threat that his current secretary of state made in 2008, waging an undeclared war on Iran and Iranians. The U.S. and Israel have launched cyber attacks, assassinated Iranian nuclear scientists , and supported armed ethnic groups that carry out terrorist operations inside Iran, killing innocent people. In addition, Israel has been active in the  Kurdistan region of Iraq and in the Republic of Azerbaijan , encouraging and supporting small separatist movements among Iranian ethnic groups, such as the Kurds and Azeris. But the most devastating part of the undeclared war on Iran is the tough econ
Read more

Chaldoran 1514 AD

Image
It was late summer in the year 1514, and Iran had a new dynasty in power(The Safavid 1501-1722). The distinctive difference here was the fact that the Safavids were the first "Shia" dynasty that used all methods in the book to convert all Iranians into a homogeneous religion, since the "Iranshahr" factor (which was the name that Iranians used for their country) did not seem enough to mobilize a sense of national unity to refute new national threats, mainly the Afghans and the Turks. The Safavid used issues like the marriage of "BiBi-Shahrbanu" (sister of the last Sassanid King) with "Imam Hussain" and the fact that the fourth Shia "Imam Zein-Ol-Abedin" had not only prophet blood, but also Iranian Royal blood, which stimulated nationalistic feelings of even the most fanatic Sunni Iranians to convert. Furthermore the most convincing argument, was the sword and the famous sentence attributed to the founder of this dynasty was "Either
Read more

Wikihoax on Iran

Image
Here are some of the supposed leaks on Iran, mixed with some true ones concerning other countries and their heads of states or controversial ministers (of course harmless ones), making it a bit problematic and that much harder for consumers of such information to "not" believe. Always remember,the most talked about issue amongst all heads of states without exception is and has been the mother of all conflicts (namely the Israeli & Palestinian conflict). Yet there is not a single word issued from anywhere or anyone, not even sworn enemies of one or the other states.... If that did not give you a reason to doubt then nothing else shall. When something smells like a fish, swims like a fish, then it must be a fish.This Wikileaks business has been the target of an article by this site (Here) So needless to emphasize anymore about disbelieving the authenticity of the content of wikileaks concerning Iran. Nonetheless, here are the Iran related ones. US Embassy Ottawa (2008) .. T
Read more