Persicus Maximus

Believe or not to believe. That is the bloody question! One hears so much lies and BS on the media that we get difficulties recognizing the truth even if right there in front of us. Politicizing the understanding of a. truth seems to have become the predisposition of neo-fascism in certain political and media spheres of the USA .When left-wing commentators denounce 9/11 truth activists, the activist/s are derided as right-wing conspiracy freaks -- lumped in with the Tea Party and various hate groups. When it is the Right's turn to attack, those seeking answers about 9/11 are uniformly painted as Bush-burnt America haters, the very worst of the left-wing losers. Today we wake up to a new media frenzy over Iranian President Ahmadinejad, apparently being now a 9/11 denier. By reading his actual and unedited speech, one realizes Ahmadinejad to have simply echoed what has been rumoured by everyone, everywhere. It could however be a wanton attempt by established news outlets in pretendin

H.A.A.R.P (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) is a fancy name for a project that has to some opinion developed itself into a weapon of mass destruction, without the smoking gun, so to say. Enough reason to take a simplified look at it, by leaving out the usual unnecessary word play that is supposed to intimidate and see what and how it actually works. This project was initially a joint effort from the US air force and the US navy, plan was to build large transmitters for bettering their communication technology by generating and experimenting with radio frequencies, so large antennas were needed since it would have needed a very large area to build and experiment,Alaska was chosen. At the beginning there were 48 antennas, around 22 Meters high and wide crossed poles on them, by 2005 there were around 180 antennas and when the project is complete, there will be around 360. The idea might have been totally different at the beginning, but it has now developed itself into

Mr Teymoor Nabili has published an article, which exactly defines the kind of philosophical and scientific manipulations that can and has taken place far too often in history than us, being ready to accept and anticipate. I shall publish the whole article underneath and leave it to you for further interpretations, regarding other historical facts that might have been changed /rewritten by intellectual rapists with Anglo-Zionist orientations. May be such editions have been done on other historical facts, maybe even the outcome of wars in history have been changed over night all to for agitating one and hailing the other civilization sympathetic towards them. Whatever the case, Iran's civilization shall not be tampered with even if this very important humanitarian historical discovery is redefined by wanton idiots on the “Wikipedia” as an unimportant piece of discovery… The article is as follows; ” The British Museum has finally lived up to its promise to lend the Cyrus Cylinder t

It has been over 30 years since the Iranian revolution shook the world. The 2500 years of rich traditional monarchy ended abruptly when the Shah (king) of Iran left, thus unleashing a spiral of brutal events which in context leaves no room but to accept its inevitability. Considering the 2 previously famous revolutions in our relative contemporary history, namely the French and the Russian revolutions, we must have expected the appearances of previously obscure elements, who politically cleansed not only the old guard but all threatening new ideas that were either established or were about to be established, no matter how small and harmless in nature. During the French revolution, we witnessed a systematic unique brutality brought about by personalities like Robespierre proving effective and successful at social and political cleansing. It was not therefore surprising that in the Russian revolution, an inconspicuous “Stalin” could so effectively suppress all alternatives of his era.

Tony Blair , one of the famous “Arses of Evil” members has written a book, probably petitioning understanding and in secret hoping for salvation. Some say, that’s why he converted to catholicism after leaving office, hoping to wipe off his ruinous wars caused by his unprecedented weakness in saying “NO”, by a few dozen “Ava Maria”s. He defended not only a historic war mongering jerk like G.Bush as courageous, but also attacked his successor Gordon Brown, who despite of his typical dry personality, did managed to bring back some “serious”aura into the British PM office. Gordon Brown’s first step was, as we all remember, going to the US and telling Bush of the end of the honey moon. Tony Blair further more touched on his alcoholicism while in office which probably was an important contributing factor to Cherie's last pregnancy. That not enough, after one reads that passage about Iran, experiencing a violent fit of laughter is inevitable, specially at the point where he claims to h