Iran, USA and Iraq



Iraq was occupied by a belated and compelled UN resolution in 2004 and now the USA is asking the Iraqi Govt. to sign a security pact, legitimizing a military occupation after 2008 . Demanding over 50 military bases and full control over Iraq's air space, unadulterated immunity for not only the military personnel but also all US citizens running around getting rich building a house or a bridge anywhere in Iraq paid by Iraq's Oil Billions..... The Iraqi/Arab humiliation will reach a peak that is unprecedented in the history of mankind......as if not enough, The American Neocons, demand it to run indefinitely.

What does it all mean for Iran?? having already been surrounded by so many US military bases starting from Western Oman through to Bahrain and Qatar, Saudi Arabian and Kuwait,,, a logistic center in southern Turkey and Azerbaijan... right around to Tajikistan and not to forget Bagram in Afghanistan....The US seems to have realized that any campaign against Iran will result in a massive lose of Military and Naval hardware, since none of the countries mentioned above dare allow themselves to stand up to Iran,,,therefore USA stands alone and at sea,,, a very unfavorable element for starting a war with such a large country by middle east standards.

Iraq on the other hand, regardless of permanent confirmations that this Pact, shall not be a threat to Iran, is by all standards and means "THE" threat that could cause a very long war between Iran and the USA , should the Israeli self oriented policy of pushing the USA into every war it can not fight itself continues. Another reason why a war would be inevitable, should this Pact be signed, is the fact that Iran is selling its Oil in non Dollar currencies, thus making it independent of the US monetary policies.

I hope for the sake of Iran, and Iran alone, That this pact does not come into being, regardless of the costs (the latest US and Israeli saber rattling upon Iran is rooted in Iran's bitter opposition towards this pact, it could even accelerate a few more sanctions ) BUT,,,it is better to have the little fight at the beginning, than have a devastating long war later in 5 years.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Sanctions

Image
Mr. M. Sahimi wrote "When she was running for president in 2008, Hillary Rodham Clinton threatened to obliterate Iran if it attacked Israel. Her opponent, Barack Obama, responded that Clinton’s threat was "too much like Bush" Four years later Iran has not attacked Israel (and will not do so, unless attacked by Israel first), but President Obama is actually carrying out the threat that his current secretary of state made in 2008, waging an undeclared war on Iran and Iranians. The U.S. and Israel have launched cyber attacks, assassinated Iranian nuclear scientists , and supported armed ethnic groups that carry out terrorist operations inside Iran, killing innocent people. In addition, Israel has been active in the  Kurdistan region of Iraq and in the Republic of Azerbaijan , encouraging and supporting small separatist movements among Iranian ethnic groups, such as the Kurds and Azeris. But the most devastating part of the undeclared war on Iran is the tough econ
Read more

Chaldoran 1514 AD

Image
It was late summer in the year 1514, and Iran had a new dynasty in power(The Safavid 1501-1722). The distinctive difference here was the fact that the Safavids were the first "Shia" dynasty that used all methods in the book to convert all Iranians into a homogeneous religion, since the "Iranshahr" factor (which was the name that Iranians used for their country) did not seem enough to mobilize a sense of national unity to refute new national threats, mainly the Afghans and the Turks. The Safavid used issues like the marriage of "BiBi-Shahrbanu" (sister of the last Sassanid King) with "Imam Hussain" and the fact that the fourth Shia "Imam Zein-Ol-Abedin" had not only prophet blood, but also Iranian Royal blood, which stimulated nationalistic feelings of even the most fanatic Sunni Iranians to convert. Furthermore the most convincing argument, was the sword and the famous sentence attributed to the founder of this dynasty was "Either
Read more

Wikihoax on Iran

Image
Here are some of the supposed leaks on Iran, mixed with some true ones concerning other countries and their heads of states or controversial ministers (of course harmless ones), making it a bit problematic and that much harder for consumers of such information to "not" believe. Always remember,the most talked about issue amongst all heads of states without exception is and has been the mother of all conflicts (namely the Israeli & Palestinian conflict). Yet there is not a single word issued from anywhere or anyone, not even sworn enemies of one or the other states.... If that did not give you a reason to doubt then nothing else shall. When something smells like a fish, swims like a fish, then it must be a fish.This Wikileaks business has been the target of an article by this site (Here) So needless to emphasize anymore about disbelieving the authenticity of the content of wikileaks concerning Iran. Nonetheless, here are the Iran related ones. US Embassy Ottawa (2008) .. T
Read more