Irans Nuclear odyssey


This Blogger believes, Iran and as a whole any country has the right to the knowledge of creating Nuclear fuel, why explicitly Iran... ??? well I tell you.
Iran has the mines
Iran is extracting (on their own)
Iran is converting ( Uranium ore is milled and purified into a powder called yellow cake)
Iran is producing uranium hexafluoride (by heating the yellow cake up to 64°)
Iran produces Gas Centifuges called IR2(it is a cylindrical chamber, in which uranium hexafluoride gas is spun at high speed This causes the slightly denser isotope u-238 to separate from the lighter u-235)
The enriched u-235 is then fed into another centrifuge. The process is repeated many times through a chain of centrifuges known as a cascade.
Iran can enrich its u235 up to 3-4% for its power plants or enrich with the above mentioned process further and eventually have enough uranium to produce a Bomb.
Iran Promised not to do so (by signing the additional protocol)still not ratified.

So far so good....but
"Iran wants to close the cycle of fuel"
(and That is the problem !!! because A typical nuclear reactor uses enriched uranium in the form of fuel "pellets", each roughly the size of a coin and about 2 centimeter long. The pellets are formed into long rods known as bundles, and housed inside a heavily insulated, pressurised chamber)
Iran has a nuclear plant and these "Rods"
will have to be reprocessed one day.
(Used fuel rods have their metallic outer casing stripped away before being dissolved in hot nitric acid. This produces uranium (96%), which is reused in reactors, highly radioactive waste (3%) and plutonium (1%))

All nuclear reactors produce plutonium
A reprocessing plant and a reactor to produce sufficient plutonium could be housed in a ordinary looking building.

Conclusion :

Iran can promise what they want ...but they are going to have "plutonium" anyway
and a plutonium Bomb is more destructive than a Uranium Bomb.

That is why they(the West) doesnt want Iran to produce their own Rods for their power plants.Thats what its all about.

Now make your own thoughts, who do u trust more Iran with the capacity to make fuel ?? a country that has not started a war for over 1000 years.. or their adversaries a la Israel / Bush & Cheeney/
AI PAC who keep claiming Iran to be a threat... Israel that has been founded on war and has had more wars in its 50-60 years of existence than all country s combined in the last 5 centuries....

Comments

Anonymous said…
Why did Natavia Lowery kill Linda Stein? Because Jews are arrogant and abusive towards everyone. They always argue unfairly. It is the nature of their Narcissistic Sadistic Personalities. They complain about the Arabs in Jerusalem? They themselves brought the Arabs into Jerusalem in 638. They helped the Persians take Jerusalem in 614, and to steal the Holy Cross. The Persians need to atone for their 614 and 538 B.C. help to the Jews with their nuclear cleansings.
Fri May 23, 01:31:00 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Sanctions

Image
Mr. M. Sahimi wrote "When she was running for president in 2008, Hillary Rodham Clinton threatened to obliterate Iran if it attacked Israel. Her opponent, Barack Obama, responded that Clinton’s threat was "too much like Bush" Four years later Iran has not attacked Israel (and will not do so, unless attacked by Israel first), but President Obama is actually carrying out the threat that his current secretary of state made in 2008, waging an undeclared war on Iran and Iranians. The U.S. and Israel have launched cyber attacks, assassinated Iranian nuclear scientists , and supported armed ethnic groups that carry out terrorist operations inside Iran, killing innocent people. In addition, Israel has been active in the  Kurdistan region of Iraq and in the Republic of Azerbaijan , encouraging and supporting small separatist movements among Iranian ethnic groups, such as the Kurds and Azeris. But the most devastating part of the undeclared war on Iran is the tough econ
Read more

Chaldoran 1514 AD

Image
It was late summer in the year 1514, and Iran had a new dynasty in power(The Safavid 1501-1722). The distinctive difference here was the fact that the Safavids were the first "Shia" dynasty that used all methods in the book to convert all Iranians into a homogeneous religion, since the "Iranshahr" factor (which was the name that Iranians used for their country) did not seem enough to mobilize a sense of national unity to refute new national threats, mainly the Afghans and the Turks. The Safavid used issues like the marriage of "BiBi-Shahrbanu" (sister of the last Sassanid King) with "Imam Hussain" and the fact that the fourth Shia "Imam Zein-Ol-Abedin" had not only prophet blood, but also Iranian Royal blood, which stimulated nationalistic feelings of even the most fanatic Sunni Iranians to convert. Furthermore the most convincing argument, was the sword and the famous sentence attributed to the founder of this dynasty was "Either
Read more

Wikihoax on Iran

Image
Here are some of the supposed leaks on Iran, mixed with some true ones concerning other countries and their heads of states or controversial ministers (of course harmless ones), making it a bit problematic and that much harder for consumers of such information to "not" believe. Always remember,the most talked about issue amongst all heads of states without exception is and has been the mother of all conflicts (namely the Israeli & Palestinian conflict). Yet there is not a single word issued from anywhere or anyone, not even sworn enemies of one or the other states.... If that did not give you a reason to doubt then nothing else shall. When something smells like a fish, swims like a fish, then it must be a fish.This Wikileaks business has been the target of an article by this site (Here) So needless to emphasize anymore about disbelieving the authenticity of the content of wikileaks concerning Iran. Nonetheless, here are the Iran related ones. US Embassy Ottawa (2008) .. T
Read more