Why "NOT" a monarchy anymore


This humble blogger, believes that if the Iranians should ever decide to have another system of governance.... which is like the nuclear issue their certain right ;) ... then it should never be the Pahlavi dynasty.

The first Pahlavi Shah was a hand picked peasant, by the Brits, and was only chosen, because the other guy refused to accept the throne. (Mirza Kuchek Khan). Took the man 15 years to emancipate, and was then thrown out for disobedience.

The second Pahlavi, allowed Iran's democracy to be compromised in 1953. He might have thought he is serving.... but many know him to have been a servant of the West. One should never forget, the Shah imprisoned his loyal servants like Hoveida and many like him and released all the leftists,communists and religious revolutionaries from prison before he himself ran off with his family. WHAT exactly did he think was gonna happen ???!!


The third half Pahlavi, is receiving some $ 75,000 monthly from the CIA to cover his monthly expenses..... I suppose they like him so much, looool or could it be they hope for a future payback ??

Whatever the case, Iranian Monarchists around the globe are actually very descent and nationalistic people, but their tendency to verbally and passively support such a system in Iran is for nostalgic, romantic nationalistic reasons.. which is incompatible with the status quo of the Iranian mentality... which I guess they shall find out soon enough...

Some believe, the Pahlavi dynasty (while in power) had turned unwillingly into Servants of Western political machination, and their present "die hard" unadulterated supporters(mostly in the West)are actually "Nokarsefat" by nature, in need of a master, unable to liberate their minds.

Whatever the case, they are history, and the future of Iran if ever a Monarchy (Which I doubt) is a new dynasty.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Sanctions

Image
Mr. M. Sahimi wrote "When she was running for president in 2008, Hillary Rodham Clinton threatened to obliterate Iran if it attacked Israel. Her opponent, Barack Obama, responded that Clinton’s threat was "too much like Bush" Four years later Iran has not attacked Israel (and will not do so, unless attacked by Israel first), but President Obama is actually carrying out the threat that his current secretary of state made in 2008, waging an undeclared war on Iran and Iranians. The U.S. and Israel have launched cyber attacks, assassinated Iranian nuclear scientists , and supported armed ethnic groups that carry out terrorist operations inside Iran, killing innocent people. In addition, Israel has been active in the  Kurdistan region of Iraq and in the Republic of Azerbaijan , encouraging and supporting small separatist movements among Iranian ethnic groups, such as the Kurds and Azeris. But the most devastating part of the undeclared war on Iran is the tough econ
Read more

Chaldoran 1514 AD

Image
It was late summer in the year 1514, and Iran had a new dynasty in power(The Safavid 1501-1722). The distinctive difference here was the fact that the Safavids were the first "Shia" dynasty that used all methods in the book to convert all Iranians into a homogeneous religion, since the "Iranshahr" factor (which was the name that Iranians used for their country) did not seem enough to mobilize a sense of national unity to refute new national threats, mainly the Afghans and the Turks. The Safavid used issues like the marriage of "BiBi-Shahrbanu" (sister of the last Sassanid King) with "Imam Hussain" and the fact that the fourth Shia "Imam Zein-Ol-Abedin" had not only prophet blood, but also Iranian Royal blood, which stimulated nationalistic feelings of even the most fanatic Sunni Iranians to convert. Furthermore the most convincing argument, was the sword and the famous sentence attributed to the founder of this dynasty was "Either
Read more

Wikihoax on Iran

Image
Here are some of the supposed leaks on Iran, mixed with some true ones concerning other countries and their heads of states or controversial ministers (of course harmless ones), making it a bit problematic and that much harder for consumers of such information to "not" believe. Always remember,the most talked about issue amongst all heads of states without exception is and has been the mother of all conflicts (namely the Israeli & Palestinian conflict). Yet there is not a single word issued from anywhere or anyone, not even sworn enemies of one or the other states.... If that did not give you a reason to doubt then nothing else shall. When something smells like a fish, swims like a fish, then it must be a fish.This Wikileaks business has been the target of an article by this site (Here) So needless to emphasize anymore about disbelieving the authenticity of the content of wikileaks concerning Iran. Nonetheless, here are the Iran related ones. US Embassy Ottawa (2008) .. T
Read more