Anti-Semitism ?


This Blogger believes, the term "anti-semitic" is a politically motivated reproach to manipulate and disarm ones adversaries....... What exactly does this word mean ....

A Semite person, is either an Arab or Jew... they are both children Abraham s the prophet.

So one can NOT be "anti-semitic" and have one or the other as friend or relative. Iranians are certainly not anti-semitic and the charge the Americans and the Israelis, in short followers of the "AI PAC" organization is false.......AI PAC is a powerful interest group in the US, with a fortune at hand that equals the same as the whole of the third world nations together, the Media is also under their monopoly and control and these people decide who to systematically destroy or promote.

There is an endless list of peoples, individuals and politicians that have been destroyed and an equal number of them promoted into positions to achieve the dominance aspired. (German politicians like Barschel and Moelleman.. are 2 examples for the destruction...the latter was even thrown out of an airplane, !! and both have been announced as suicide).... President Sarkuzi of France is an example for promotion.....he has been working for Moossad since the 1980's... even confirmed it.

In short "Antisemitism" is a Western Christian phenomenon, and not an Eastern one......Iranians and even the President of Iran, whom has become a symbol of this politically motivated charge is not antisemitic.... because of the simple fact that he enjoys the best of relationships with his Arab allies and even follows an Arabic originated religion..... and as we know now.. ARABS ARE SEMITES...dig ????

So lets not have ur intelligence insulted by these charges...... those who are ignorant enough to believe these charges are either political peasants or simply socially illiterate (people who watch too much TV and allow the TV to think for them... did I mention.... AI PAC has the Media under control ??)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Sanctions

Image
Mr. M. Sahimi wrote "When she was running for president in 2008, Hillary Rodham Clinton threatened to obliterate Iran if it attacked Israel. Her opponent, Barack Obama, responded that Clinton’s threat was "too much like Bush" Four years later Iran has not attacked Israel (and will not do so, unless attacked by Israel first), but President Obama is actually carrying out the threat that his current secretary of state made in 2008, waging an undeclared war on Iran and Iranians. The U.S. and Israel have launched cyber attacks, assassinated Iranian nuclear scientists , and supported armed ethnic groups that carry out terrorist operations inside Iran, killing innocent people. In addition, Israel has been active in the  Kurdistan region of Iraq and in the Republic of Azerbaijan , encouraging and supporting small separatist movements among Iranian ethnic groups, such as the Kurds and Azeris. But the most devastating part of the undeclared war on Iran is the tough econ
Read more

Chaldoran 1514 AD

Image
It was late summer in the year 1514, and Iran had a new dynasty in power(The Safavid 1501-1722). The distinctive difference here was the fact that the Safavids were the first "Shia" dynasty that used all methods in the book to convert all Iranians into a homogeneous religion, since the "Iranshahr" factor (which was the name that Iranians used for their country) did not seem enough to mobilize a sense of national unity to refute new national threats, mainly the Afghans and the Turks. The Safavid used issues like the marriage of "BiBi-Shahrbanu" (sister of the last Sassanid King) with "Imam Hussain" and the fact that the fourth Shia "Imam Zein-Ol-Abedin" had not only prophet blood, but also Iranian Royal blood, which stimulated nationalistic feelings of even the most fanatic Sunni Iranians to convert. Furthermore the most convincing argument, was the sword and the famous sentence attributed to the founder of this dynasty was "Either
Read more

Wikihoax on Iran

Image
Here are some of the supposed leaks on Iran, mixed with some true ones concerning other countries and their heads of states or controversial ministers (of course harmless ones), making it a bit problematic and that much harder for consumers of such information to "not" believe. Always remember,the most talked about issue amongst all heads of states without exception is and has been the mother of all conflicts (namely the Israeli & Palestinian conflict). Yet there is not a single word issued from anywhere or anyone, not even sworn enemies of one or the other states.... If that did not give you a reason to doubt then nothing else shall. When something smells like a fish, swims like a fish, then it must be a fish.This Wikileaks business has been the target of an article by this site (Here) So needless to emphasize anymore about disbelieving the authenticity of the content of wikileaks concerning Iran. Nonetheless, here are the Iran related ones. US Embassy Ottawa (2008) .. T
Read more