US deliberately targeting Shia anti ISIS fighters!






Very credible Iraqi Shi’ite institutions and groups fighting alongside the Iraqi regular army are threatening retaliation against US forces in the country should this pattern of targeting their forces whilst fighting the DAESH /ISIS by US Planes continue. Several recent incidents of so called “friendly fire” deaths in air strikes proved that the Pentagon was deliberately targeting the Shia during the fighting against ISIS..… This explains why the Iranians left the scene during the recent successful liberation of Iraqi territories from the ISIS with leaks of info and Photos of Gen. Soleimani being actively on the Ground helping. (Iran’s specialists and advisers immediately left the scene after seeing the American planes to be constantly attacking and bombing the wrong sites). The US claimed hereupon, that the Iranians did not want to be seen fighting alongside the Americans…

The very recent incidents took place in the Anbar Province, where thousands of Shi’ite volunteer militia fighters have been rushed by the government to try to resist a recent ISIS expansion, which must be mentioned was only possible ( recent expansion of ISIS) after US planes with their constant “false bombardments” made sure no competent Shia organization was left around  to stop this push.

As always…The Pentagon, used its default denials that anyone but ISIS were killed in any of their air strikes, In the recent times however, issued what must be the least credible denial possible by insisting they don’t even have planes flying over Anbar in the first place, despite this being where all the fighting in Iraq is lately and despite the Pentagon itself issuing statements on a daily basis claiming air strikes in the Anbar Province.

This determination by Pentagon to deny any wrongdoing under any circumstances is ringing so hollow and insulting at this point that there is very little reason for anyone to give them the benefit of the doubt. With the Iraqi government increasingly reliant on the Shi’ite fighters (who happen to be the majority of Iraq’s population) to do their fighting, the risk of a falling out between the Shia majority of Iraq’s population and the US could be bad news indeed….. Should the Iraqi government ever see necessary to pick sides, they’ll be obliged to pick the Shi’ites….. Where 65% are Shia Moslems and 15% Kurds, which leaves a 20% dispersed Sunni block supported, financed and armed by a bunch of Saudi Arabian Wahabi "Royal" overfed OIL prince/individuals... via a rented NATO member Turkey… now you do the Math’s.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Sanctions

Image
Mr. M. Sahimi wrote "When she was running for president in 2008, Hillary Rodham Clinton threatened to obliterate Iran if it attacked Israel. Her opponent, Barack Obama, responded that Clinton’s threat was "too much like Bush" Four years later Iran has not attacked Israel (and will not do so, unless attacked by Israel first), but President Obama is actually carrying out the threat that his current secretary of state made in 2008, waging an undeclared war on Iran and Iranians. The U.S. and Israel have launched cyber attacks, assassinated Iranian nuclear scientists , and supported armed ethnic groups that carry out terrorist operations inside Iran, killing innocent people. In addition, Israel has been active in the  Kurdistan region of Iraq and in the Republic of Azerbaijan , encouraging and supporting small separatist movements among Iranian ethnic groups, such as the Kurds and Azeris. But the most devastating part of the undeclared war on Iran is the tough econ
Read more

Chaldoran 1514 AD

Image
It was late summer in the year 1514, and Iran had a new dynasty in power(The Safavid 1501-1722). The distinctive difference here was the fact that the Safavids were the first "Shia" dynasty that used all methods in the book to convert all Iranians into a homogeneous religion, since the "Iranshahr" factor (which was the name that Iranians used for their country) did not seem enough to mobilize a sense of national unity to refute new national threats, mainly the Afghans and the Turks. The Safavid used issues like the marriage of "BiBi-Shahrbanu" (sister of the last Sassanid King) with "Imam Hussain" and the fact that the fourth Shia "Imam Zein-Ol-Abedin" had not only prophet blood, but also Iranian Royal blood, which stimulated nationalistic feelings of even the most fanatic Sunni Iranians to convert. Furthermore the most convincing argument, was the sword and the famous sentence attributed to the founder of this dynasty was "Either
Read more

Wikihoax on Iran

Image
Here are some of the supposed leaks on Iran, mixed with some true ones concerning other countries and their heads of states or controversial ministers (of course harmless ones), making it a bit problematic and that much harder for consumers of such information to "not" believe. Always remember,the most talked about issue amongst all heads of states without exception is and has been the mother of all conflicts (namely the Israeli & Palestinian conflict). Yet there is not a single word issued from anywhere or anyone, not even sworn enemies of one or the other states.... If that did not give you a reason to doubt then nothing else shall. When something smells like a fish, swims like a fish, then it must be a fish.This Wikileaks business has been the target of an article by this site (Here) So needless to emphasize anymore about disbelieving the authenticity of the content of wikileaks concerning Iran. Nonetheless, here are the Iran related ones. US Embassy Ottawa (2008) .. T
Read more